Perspective: The Mass

Comments

You bring up a lot of valid points. Your last paragraph especially makes me think of all the counter-culture movements of the 60s that I'm learning about... or just the 1960s in general. It seems like we're coming to another juncture in history when we need to take a stand for our liberties and our agency, as you put it. It just seems that people are less willing to get up and do anything than in the 60s, whether it be out of the fear of terrorism (instead of nuclear war/communists) or out of a dangerous complacency due to the fact that things aren't really 'that bad' for most individuals in the US. In any case, Critical Mass is a great example of non-violent protest (even if not every participant is there specifically to protest, it seems to me the most accurate description of the event) that effectively brings to light many of the problems with today's society, and I hope it makes people reflect on some of those problems, or even better, inspires some to act out against them.

And on one last note.... no wonder you didn't get any sleep last night. If you can write like this when you're exhausted, just think of what you could come up with if you got enough sleep, lol.
[c’est top]
Why should you be exempt from the traffic laws though. The whole point of the Critical Mass is to say that a bike is also part of the traffic. So why don't you have to obey traffic laws like every other car on the road does?

The problem is twofold: drivers do not regard us as traffic, and traffic laws give minimal (or not enough) consideration to cyclists.

The point is to say, "We belong here, but drivers and lawmakers seem to have forgotten that." That's why I think Critical Mass should make a cohesive, unified effort to legalize corking (and we would have to define corking very specifically). Once Critical Mass can more realistically operate within the confines of traffic law, then riders will feel less entitled to break other, more important laws by doing things like jumping up on the sidewalk, crossing the double-yellow, or running a red alone.

And I suppose the question becomes, "Why should corking be legal?" The reason is simpler than most make it out to be: safety first, efficiency second--it's the same priority underlying all traffic law. It doesn't take much time on a bicycle to realize that 1) the streets and the traffic lights are designed for cars, and 2) you are by far the most vulnerable vehicle on the road. Cyclists tend to ride in groups, whether they be groups of 400 or groups of 4 (because no one notices a solo cyclist), and when the yellow light doesn't even last long enough for you to scoot out of the intersection when you're already in it, corking is really the most effective (if not the only) mechanism for keeping safe and keeping together (i.e. safe) on the road.

"We are traffic" doesn't mean "We are the same." Any bicycle-car collision can attest to that.


I wholeheartedly agree that we, as bikers (especially in Southern California) are treated as second-class vehicles, if vehicles at all. It's a scary experience out there trying to discern whether or not the other vehicles around you are knowledgeable about traffic laws regarding the safety of bicycles on the road, and every wrong guess carries the possibility of something terrible happening.

[Also, for future reference, if you want to quote long passages (like your letter to the editor), you can use the HTML
I wholeheartedly agree that we, as bikers (especially in Southern California) are treated as second-class vehicles, if vehicles at all. It's a scary experience out there trying to discern whether or not the other vehicles around you are knowledgeable about traffic laws regarding the safety of bicycles on the road, and every wrong guess carries the possibility of something terrible happening.

[Also, for future reference, if you want to quote long passages (like your letter to the editor), you can use the HTML blockquote tag.]

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in